Tax Protestor Antics

ROBERT CHARLES & LISA JEAN ABELL weren't able to ring a bell in defense of their frivolous arguments against IRS when they appealed their lower-court loss to the Tenth Circuit. They appear to have acted more like Cain than Abell.

Start-up Expenses, Office-in-the-Home, and More

JOHN Y. DING faced the IRS in Tax Court relative to what they claimed were his "business expenses." He claimed a bunch of expenses relative to his employment and a prospective business he was trying to get off the ground. It results in an interesting discussion and analysis of various matters including start-up expenses versus business expenses, rules governing an office in the home, and documentation, including the application of the Cohen rule.

Education Expenses --- Are They Deductible?

This case gives a good review of applicable law:
LORI A. SINGLETON-CLARKE vs COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

It involves a RN who went back to school to become more effective in her then-present duties. She realized that nursing had evolved greatly in the 24 years since she earned her bachelor’s degree, and she felt disadvantaged working with highly educated doctors.

Ronald Davenport

I had to mention this case. I just had to.

I knew a Ronnie Davenport growing up. His brother, Tommy, was one of my contemporaries and best buddies. The Davenports I knew as a boy were all the most clever and interesting people. Ronnie, as I recall, was into short-wave radio, among other things. This was back before cell phones --- even before a lot of people had land-line telephones or TVs. I was always way impressed with Ronnie talking on that radio with people all around the world. It reminds me of the opening scene of the movie Contact. Of course Ronnie was no Jodie Foster and wasn't trying to contact a deceased parent. His parents were very much alive.

Anyway, the guy in this case couldn't be Ronnie from my boyhood. No way.

Ronald Davenport (of the case) faced the following proposals for more tax and penalties:

The Judge opined:

Petitioner is no stranger to the Court. The following is petitioner's history in this Court:

Well, I won't bore you with the details --- if you want them you can just read the opinion --- other than to say Ronnie did not cooperate with IRS and lost his case. He looks like the typical tax protestor, making silly, frivolous arguments that won't fly.

Two Tuesday Memo Decisions

The Tax Court issued two memorandum opinions today. One involves the determination that Linda Bruen was an innocent spouse, even though that terminology always seems like an oxymoron to me. The other one has to do with the nature of income from a cashed-in life insurance policy that the Barr couple received and the accuracy penalty the government said was attributable to them not properly reporting the nature of such incom.

What's in a Name?

Peter M. Comensoli challenged the IRS in Tax Court. He was represented by Matthew S. DePerno. Alexandra E. Nicholaides represented the IRS. The IRS wanted to use its lien and levy powers to collect some taxes from Peter. Peter didn't want that to happen. The judge was named Goeke --- I didn't look up the rest of his name. Some of the players in the case were Paradym Group and A. Adonu Idahosa (makes me wonder what the "A." stands for). Symphony Financial Services was a player as was TCF Leasing, Inc. So was Back Porch Workout. Some of the action took place in Kalamazoo, Michigan.

I'm wreddyornot. Who are you?

Laughing Out Loud

These lines from a tax decision struck me funny. "Anthony Oropeza earned wages in 2002 and 2003 but reported zero income and zero tax liabilities because, he wrote in attachments to the returns, his income was not 'income' in the 'constitutional' sense. Mr. Oropeza’s position is, in a word, 'frivolous.' Just like we held it was the last time he was in Tax Court."